{"id":3536,"date":"2020-12-18T14:44:28","date_gmt":"2020-12-18T13:44:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/?p=3536"},"modified":"2026-01-15T15:18:23","modified_gmt":"2026-01-15T15:18:23","slug":"december-core-update-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem [Opinion]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">David McSweeney is our Chief Editor here at Seobility. He wrote and edited most of the recent guides and articles on our blog. The following article is his assessment of the state of Google Core Updates.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Google dropped an early Christmas present on the SEO community earlier this month, with their first (official) Core algorithm update in over 7 months.<\/p>\n<p>And it\u2019s safe to say, it was one of the biggest SERP shake-ups seen in recent times.<\/p>\n<p>So what was this update all about? And has it actually improved the search results?<\/p>\n<p>Well, before we delve into observations, conjecture, and perhaps a sprinkling of conspiracy, let\u2019s start with the facts.<\/p>\n<div class=\"toc-container\"><div class=\"toc-h3\">Content<\/div><ul class=\"toc-list\"><li><a href='#content-google-s-december-core-update-a-quick-timeline' class='toc-link toc-link-level-2'>Google\u2019s December Core Update: A Quick Timeline<\/a><\/li><li><a href='#content-what-is-google-trying-to-achieve-with-their-core-updates-and-are-they-succeeding' class='toc-link toc-link-level-2'>What is Google trying to achieve with their Core updates? And are they succeeding?<\/a><\/li><li><a href='#content-why-google-s-core-updates-encourage-more-spam-and-less-investment-in-quality-content' class='toc-link toc-link-level-2'>Why Google\u2019s Core updates encourage more spam, and less investment in quality content<\/a><\/li><li><a href='#content-in-conclusion-and-our-advice-if-you-ve-been-hit-by-a-core-update' class='toc-link toc-link-level-2'>In conclusion (and our advice if you\u2019ve been hit by a Core update)<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n<h2 id='content-google-s-december-core-update-a-quick-timeline'>Google\u2019s December Core Update: A Quick Timeline<\/h2>\n<p>Most SEOs (myself included) weren\u2019t expecting another Google Core update this year.<\/p>\n<p>We had been anticipating one hitting around September\/October. But when that didn\u2019t arrive, we figured Google wouldn\u2019t roll anything out before January. It was a reasonable assumption, as normally they don\u2019t rock the boat too much in the run up to the holidays.<\/p>\n<p>We were dead wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Because on the third of December, we got a couple of hours notice <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/searchliaison\/status\/1334562142566055936\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">with a tweet<\/a>, then it was time to ride the Core update rollercoaster.<\/p>\n<p>The Semrush sensor (which tracks SERP volatility) started spiking on the evening of the third, and kept rising all the way up to a whopping 9.4 on the fourth.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3537\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/semrush-sensor1.png\" alt=\"google december core update - semrush sensor\" width=\"775\" height=\"883\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/semrush-sensor1.png 775w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/semrush-sensor1-768x875.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 775px) 100vw, 775px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>And for those hit by the update, the impact was felt immediately.<\/p>\n<p>You can see the sudden divergence in hourly search traffic on this chart from Google analytics (3rd December vs 2nd December).<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3538\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact.png\" alt=\"december core update impact\" width=\"881\" height=\"218\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact.png 881w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact-768x190.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 881px) 100vw, 881px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">In case you didn\u2019t guess by the big red arrow, the Core update hits at around 5pm (PST).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>That particular site lost around 60% of its search traffic overnight. Ouch.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3539\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact2.png\" alt=\"december core update - day by day comparison\" width=\"879\" height=\"218\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact2.png 879w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact2-768x190.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 879px) 100vw, 879px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Naturally those who were hit with the update were in a panic.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s no good time to lose search traffic. But for anyone involved in the retail sector (and let\u2019s face it, most sites are to some extent) getting crushed at the start of the Christmas shopping season is quite literally devastating.<\/p>\n<p>And we (us wise old SEOs again) figured that those who had lost traffic would need to sit tight, work on improving their sites, and wait for the next Core update for reassessment\/recovery. We expected that \u2014 usual small fluctuations notwithstanding \u2014 it would be a few months before any big shake up in the SERPs again.<\/p>\n<p>We anticipated that those hit would stay hit until the next Core update. Frozen in time if you will.<\/p>\n<p>And once again we were completely wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Because on the 10th of December, Google cranked the dial again.<\/p>\n<p>And while it wasn\u2019t quite as big an update as the 3rd, many sites saw a reversal in fortunes.<\/p>\n<p>The site in the analytics screenshots above for example regained most of its traffic (Dec 13th vs Dec 4th).<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3540\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact3.png\" alt=\"december core update recovery\" width=\"885\" height=\"214\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact3.png 885w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/core-update-impact3-768x186.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 885px) 100vw, 885px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>And SEO forums such as Webmaster World <a href=\"https:\/\/www.webmasterworld.com\/google\/5018435-8-30.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">were full of stories<\/a> from those who had their initial gains of the 3rd completely reversed on the 10th.<\/p>\n<p>Google giveth, Google taketh away.<\/p>\n<p>Other sites stayed the same (they remained winners or losers).<\/p>\n<p>And many weren\u2019t impacted by either update and probably wondered what all the fuss was about.<\/p>\n<p>Like this retail directory site, whose Search Console Performance chart shows a relatively stable line (or lines) throughout the whole period.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3542\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/searchconsole-traffic.png\" alt=\"searchconsole traffic\" width=\"902\" height=\"355\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/searchconsole-traffic.png 902w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/searchconsole-traffic-768x302.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 902px) 100vw, 902px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Update? What update?<\/p>\n<p>On the 16th December Google announced that the roll out of their latest core update was complete.<\/p>\n<p>And like the Grand Old Juke of York\u2019s men, if you\u2019re up you\u2019re up, and if you\u2019re down you\u2019re down. At least until the next Core update.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update<\/b>: there&#8217;s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/google-search-ranking-algorithm-update-8th-day-30625.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/google-search-ranking-algorithm-update-8th-day-30625.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1608391513441000&amp;usg=AFQjCNHqJrZwRDtr7dgehu-Wl-71oIKMCQ\">increasing chatter<\/a>\u00a0of a further SERP shake up today. So it seems the update might not be quite over yet!<\/p>\n<p>Which means we can now take a look at the search results and make some assessments.<\/p>\n<p>So let\u2019s move on and ask a question. Or two questions if you want to be pedantic&#8230;<\/p>\n<h2 id='content-what-is-google-trying-to-achieve-with-their-core-updates-and-are-they-succeeding'>What is Google trying to achieve with their Core updates? And are they succeeding?<\/h2>\n<p>Google has a stock response for questions related to Core updates.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ll point you to <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2019\/08\/core-updates\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">this 2019 blog post<\/a> by Danny Sullivan.<\/p>\n<p>To save you a few minutes, we can summarize the 1,632 words into:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Create quality content (or improve your existing content)<\/li>\n<li>Build your (and your site\u2019s) credibility<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Point 2 there is what\u2019s generally referred to as E-A-T (expertise, authority, trust).<\/p>\n<p>And <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/google-e-e-a-t\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">we just published a huge guide to how to do that here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So Google wants to rank high quality content from trusted sites.<\/p>\n<p>Cool. All good so far.<\/p>\n<p>And we definitely recommend you follow that advice.<\/p>\n<p>But the problem is, if you\u2019re someone like me who spends hours (days?) clicking through search results and digging under the hood, you\u2019ll find example after example of sites ranking for highly competitive keywords which tick neither box.<\/p>\n<p>Now I\u2019m not trying to out specific sites in this post. All\u2019s fair in love, war, and SEO.<\/p>\n<p>(Although it does present a wider problem, which I\u2019ll get to)<\/p>\n<p>But here are some blatant examples of where Google\u2019s quality and trust objective is falling apart.<\/p>\n<h3>1. Repurposed domains continue to coin it in<\/h3>\n<p>It\u2019s no big secret.<\/p>\n<p>Repurposed, high authority aged domains continue to rank fast, and rank high, even if the domain had no previous connection to the current niche.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">In case you don\u2019t know, a repurposed domain is a new site built on an old, expired domain, which has a strong, aged backlink profile.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s an example in the sports niche.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3543\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/repurposed-domain.png\" alt=\"repurposed domain - search traffic\" width=\"727\" height=\"272\" \/><\/p>\n<p>To summarize, the site above was:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>launched in September 2019<\/li>\n<li>quickly grew to 15k organics p\/m* (making it one of the biggest sites in this lucrative niche)<\/li>\n<li>took a bit of a dip with the May 2020 Core update<\/li>\n<li>came roaring back after the December Core update<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><em>*traffic estimates from tools are exactly that, estimates, and should be taken with a grain of salt. However, I happen to know the actual volumes\/CTRs in this particular niche &#8211; and I expect actual organic traffic is closer to 50k\/month.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So why is it ranking? And why did it benefit from the December Core update?<\/p>\n<p>Well, here\u2019s what the site doesn\u2019t have:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>An about us page<\/li>\n<li>Any contact info<\/li>\n<li>Any author info<\/li>\n<li>A privacy policy<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>And here\u2019s what it does have:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>A ton of powerful links picked up between 2005 and 2011 when the domain was home to a European cultural organization<\/li>\n<li>Lots of low quality (but reasonably lengthy) keyword focused articles<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>To be clear, none of the links are in any way relevant to the current niche\/site.<\/p>\n<p>And for extra lolz, a quick look at the domain on archive.org shows that it also spent a couple of years (2017-2018) happily living as a PBN site for a law firm.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s been around the block.<\/p>\n<h4>The takeaways:<\/h4>\n<ol>\n<li>Google still overly weights links in their algorithm, particularly when it comes to measuring trust.<\/li>\n<li>Despite <a href=\"https:\/\/fatjoe.com\/googles-john-mueller-put-an-end-to-pbns\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">what they might say publicly<\/a> (see John Mueller\u2019s quote below) there\u2019s still no reset for links when an old domain is repurposed.<\/li>\n<li>And authority trumps relevance when it comes to links.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3544\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/john-mueller-1.png\" alt=\"john mueller\" width=\"788\" height=\"280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/john-mueller-1.png 788w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/john-mueller-1-768x273.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 788px) 100vw, 788px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Are you sure about that John?<\/span><\/p>\n<h4>Update 22nd December:<\/h4>\n<p>Matt Diggity, from our friends over at <a href=\"https:\/\/diggitymarketing.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Diggity Marketing,<\/a> sent over this example of a repurposed domain in the health niche, which Google has taken a particular shine to.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3583\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/expired-domain2.png\" alt=\"repurposed domain\" width=\"714\" height=\"261\" \/><\/p>\n<p>If you think of the health niche that generates the most spam (and Google should be particularly sensitive about) you can probably guess what subniche it&#8217;s in.<\/p>\n<p>And according to Matt, E-A-T is non-existent. It&#8217;s &#8220;all links&#8221;.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-3584\" style=\"border-radius: 50px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/matt-diggity-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"matt diggity\" width=\"50\" height=\"50\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/matt-diggity-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/matt-diggity.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 50px) 100vw, 50px\" \/>Google seems to be rewarding links. Especially high authority links. Repurposed domains are ranking left and right and they have nothing going for them except their links.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h3>2. Google\u2019s still got a big problem with cloaked redirects<\/h3>\n<p>If you read the comments on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/google-december-2020-core-update-30545.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Barry Schwartz\u2019 post<\/a> which covered the initial 4th December roll out, you might have seen a guy called Joseph ranting about the search results for \u201cfree classifieds\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3545\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/free-classifieds.png\" alt=\"comment on core update\" width=\"671\" height=\"263\" \/><\/p>\n<p>And the thing is\u2026 he\u2019s completely right.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a screen recording showing what happens when you click on the result at position 9.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 640px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-3536-1\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/webm\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/serp-redirect-1.webm?_=1\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/serp-redirect-1.webm\">https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/serp-redirect-1.webm<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p>You can\u2019t see it on the recording, but suffice to say, my anti-virus went nuts.<\/p>\n<p>And \u201cfree classifieds\u201d is not exactly a low competition keyword. It has a search volume of 4.6K, a difficulty score of 50, and a $2.50 CPC.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3546\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/freeclassifieds-stats.png\" alt=\"free classifieds keyword stats\" width=\"832\" height=\"322\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/freeclassifieds-stats.png 832w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/freeclassifieds-stats-768x297.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 832px) 100vw, 832px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>So it\u2019s safe to assume that plenty of people are going to be clicking on that result. Some of them might even end up with a virus on their machine.<\/p>\n<p>YMYL Google?<\/p>\n<p>This isn\u2019t a new problem. But it certainly hasn\u2019t gone away with the latest Core update. In my post-update SERP digging I came across spammy redirects on numerous search results.<\/p>\n<p>In case you\u2019re not familiar with what\u2019s going on here, the website is showing Google different content to what a user will actually see when they hit the page. It\u2019s a technique called cloaking, has been around for as long as Google has, and really should have been dealt with a long time ago.<\/p>\n<p>Needless to say, it\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/advanced\/guidelines\/cloaking\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a clear violation of Google\u2019s webmaster guidelines<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Cloaking refers to the practice of presenting different content or URLs to human users and search engines. Cloaking is considered a violation of Google&#8217;s Webmaster Guidelines because it provides our users with different results than they expected.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But it also highlights a wider issue with Google\u2019s assessment of content quality.<\/p>\n<p>Because we can use <a href=\"https:\/\/botsimulator.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">this tool<\/a> to find out what Googlebot actually sees when it crawls the page.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3547\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/googlebot-emulator.png\" alt=\"googlebot emulator\" width=\"834\" height=\"523\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/googlebot-emulator.png 834w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/googlebot-emulator-480x300.png 480w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/googlebot-emulator-768x482.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 834px) 100vw, 834px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Yep, a load of scraped, gobbledygook text.<\/p>\n<p>Almost 5,000 words of scraped, gobbledygook text to be specific&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-large wp-image-3548\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/wordcounter-1024x747.png\" alt=\"wordcounter\" width=\"640\" height=\"467\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&#8230;with the phrase \u201cfree classifieds\u201d repeated 54 times for a keyword density of 7%.<\/p>\n<p>I can\u2019t quite believe I\u2019m talking about keyword density in 2020, but we are where we are.<\/p>\n<p>If I pick a random sentence from the scraped content I can find the original source.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3549\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/scraped-text.png\" alt=\"scraped text\" width=\"820\" height=\"663\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/scraped-text.png 820w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/scraped-text-768x621.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 820px) 100vw, 820px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Which also reveals that there are literally thousands of these scraper sites using exactly the same text, and they\u2019re all indexed by Google.<\/p>\n<h4>The takeaways<\/h4>\n<ol>\n<li>Google still hasn\u2019t figured out how to identify cloaked URLs, at least not in a timely manner before they\u2019re indexed and ranked<\/li>\n<li>Scraped text, combined from multiple sources can (and does) rank<\/li>\n<li>Google\u2019s not as advanced at figuring out what is and isn\u2019t quality content as they would like us to believe<\/li>\n<li>Keyword density is probably still a thing (ugh)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold\">Note<\/span>: the page in the screen recording was ranking for at least three days, but now appears to be gone. However, it\u2019s since been replaced by a new cloaked page, which is ranking even higher.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3550\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/cloaked2.png\" alt=\"cloaked result\" width=\"893\" height=\"679\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/cloaked2.png 893w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/cloaked2-768x584.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 893px) 100vw, 893px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s SERP whack-a-mole.<\/p>\n<h3>3. Can\u2019t rank for a YMYL keyword? Throw up a doorway page on a Google site<\/h3>\n<p>You might have heard of parasite SEO before. It involves setting up a page (sometimes legitimately, sometimes not so legitimately) on a high authority domain, and ranking that single page for a competitive keyword based on the host domain\u2019s strength.<\/p>\n<p>Normally the page will be set up as a doorway page, which exists simply to link back to a money site.<\/p>\n<p>Google <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/advanced\/guidelines\/doorway-pages\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">doesn\u2019t like doorway pages<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Doorways are sites or pages created to rank highly for specific search queries. They are bad for users because they can lead to multiple similar pages in user search results, where each result ends up taking the user to essentially the same destination. They can also lead users to intermediate pages that are not as useful as the final destination.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But unfortunately\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;it happens to host a LOT of them.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, I checked the organic keywords for \u201csites.google.com\/site\/\u201d and discovered that the subdomain currently ranks on page one for over 13,000 \u201cbuy\u201d keywords.<\/p>\n<p>Now some of these might be legitimate sites.<\/p>\n<p>But a big percentage of them look like this&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3551\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/jintropin-doorway.png\" alt=\"doorway page\" width=\"979\" height=\"677\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/jintropin-doorway.png 979w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/jintropin-doorway-768x531.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 979px) 100vw, 979px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Which at the time of writing (after the Core update has fully rolled out) is still sitting pretty at #1 for its target keyword.<\/p>\n<p>A keyword which gets 100 US searches a month and is very much YMYL.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s just one example. But there are THOUSANDS of similar doorway pages hosted on single page Google sites. They rank for everything from cheap flights, to credit card offers, to imported cigarettes, and every pill and potion under the sun.<\/p>\n<p>And of course, it\u2019s not just Google sites. There are plenty of other domains (unwittingly) hosting similar doorway pages.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s not get started on Pinterest&#8230;<\/p>\n<h4>The takeaway<\/h4>\n<p>Doorway pages on high authority parent domains still rank for many competitive (often YMYL) terms<\/p>\n<h3>Overall takeaway: Google\u2019s going for the squirrels and completely disregarding the elephants<\/h3>\n<p>I highlighted the three tactics above \u2014 repurposed domains, cloaked pages, doorway pages \u2014 because they\u2019re clear and obvious. They should be easy for a search engine as advanced as Google to spot and filter out.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re the elephants in the room, which Google seems to be either incapable, or unwilling to deal with.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the squirrels \u2014 who may be a little mischievous, but generally play by the rules \u2014 get punished.<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s a big problem..<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n<h2 id='content-why-google-s-core-updates-encourage-more-spam-and-less-investment-in-quality-content'>Why Google\u2019s Core updates encourage more spam, and less investment in quality content<\/h2>\n<p>I\u2019m going to kick off this section by quoting <a href=\"https:\/\/www.webmasterworld.com\/google\/5018435-6-30.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a post from Webmaster World<\/a>. Because I really can\u2019t put it any better myself.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">\u201cAt least before you knew that provided you didn&#8217;t break Google&#8217;s webmaster guidelines and genuinely produced useful content, you were never going to be affected by an update reducing your traffic by -40%-80% just like that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">That stuff was supposed to be reserved for the spammers, scrappers and link scheme guys.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Now all these people outrank you with their expired domain 301 redirect and Fiverr articles just because of their link authority.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Now you suddenly ask why you shouldn&#8217;t start to spam yourself. Sure, you will get penalized eventually but so will you with your &#8220;white hat&#8221; site anyway at one point, and making a spam site is so much cheaper and simpler than a legit one. Why not just start making 10?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">And now the web is a poorer place because you can&#8217;t find genuinely expert content anymore in narrow fields that aren&#8217;t covered by the big brands and mainstream sites. And full of even more spammers.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Nail. On. Head.<\/p>\n<p>Because it\u2019s not just the fact that spam continues to rank that\u2019s the problem. The spam has always been there.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s the fact that even if you\u2019re playing by the rules, you might still take a big hit in a Core update.<\/p>\n<p>Can\u2019t happen to you? Well&#8230;<\/p>\n<h3>You might not be alright Jack<\/h3>\n<p>There are plenty of SEOs that will tell you that they don\u2019t worry about Google Core updates as they\u2019re doing nothing wrong. In fact, I used to be one of them.<\/p>\n<p>But they should.<\/p>\n<p>Because <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pathinteractive.com\/blog\/seo\/1000-winners-and-losers-of-the-december-2020-google-core-algorithm-update\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">if the New York Times can lose a whack of search visibility overnight<\/a>, then so can anyone.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone contentimage size-full wp-image-3552\" src=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/search-visibility.png\" alt=\"search visibility - losers\" width=\"755\" height=\"473\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/search-visibility.png 755w, https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/search-visibility-480x300.png 480w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 755px) 100vw, 755px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold\">Note<\/span>: this doesn\u2019t imply that the New York Times lost 21.4% of their traffic in the update (it\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sistrix.com\/support\/sistrix-visibility-index-explanation-background-and-calculation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a bit more complex than that<\/a>), but it\u2019s reasonable to assume they took a decent sized hit.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s hard to argue that content quality and trust is the issue when we\u2019re talking about The New York Times.<\/p>\n<p>And whatsmore&#8230;<\/p>\n<h3>What\u2019s good today might not be good tomorrow (but might be fine again in three months time)<\/h3>\n<p>I\u2019ve been involved in SEO for over 20 years. I\u2019ve been there in the trenches through every major update. I danced the Google dance back in the late 90s. I remember when \u201cFlorida\u201d hit in 2003 \u2014 it was a clear improvement.<\/p>\n<p>Penguin made sense. Panda made sense. Hummingbird made a lot of sense.<\/p>\n<p>Medic kind of made sense.<\/p>\n<p>But ever since, there\u2019s been a seeming randomness to Google\u2019s Core updates.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve seen plenty of sites that were crushed in one, changed nothing, recovered completely, were hit in the next one, recovered again\u2026<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re talking about going from the top spots, to nowhere, to back in the top spots again.<\/p>\n<p>Hundreds of articles have been written about how to recover from Core updates. I would wager that \u201cdo nothing\u201d and wait is not advice you\u2019ll see written in many of them.<\/p>\n<p>Now I should point out here that sometimes (perhaps most of the time), it\u2019s clear what\u2019s up. There\u2019s an obvious issue with E-A-T or content quality that can be addressed. Or there\u2019s a technical issue holding the site back.<\/p>\n<p>But other times, there really is no logical reason for a hit. Which chimes with this horrible paragraph from <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2019\/08\/core-updates\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Google\u2019s Core update advice post<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">We know those with sites that experience drops will be looking for a fix, and we want to ensure they don&#8217;t try to fix the wrong things. Moreover, there might not be anything to fix at all.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s nothing you can do about it\u201d isn\u2019t what you want to hear when you\u2019ve just lost 90% of your revenue overnight.<\/p>\n<p>You didn\u2019t do anything wrong, but you\u2019re not going to eat tomorrow. Wait three months. Soz.<\/p>\n<h3>With great power comes great responsibility<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">(apologies for the clich\u00e9)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Let me dial back a little at this stage and say that Google has an incredibly tough job.<\/p>\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2020\/06\/how-we-fought-search-spam-on-google\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">this post<\/a> they successfully catch 25 billion newly discovered spam pages every single day.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a mind blowing amount of content. The equivalent of every man, woman, and child on Earth churning out 3+ pages of spam every 24 hours.<\/p>\n<p>And I\u2019ve no reason to doubt their claim (in the same post) that 99% of visits from Google search results lead to spam free experiences.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s also fair to say that Google can\u2019t please everyone. In any niche there\u2019s going to be multiple sites competing for the top spots. They all want to be number 1, but by definition, only one of them can be.<\/p>\n<p>Ups and downs in search traffic are to be expected. If a competitor is working harder than you \u2014 creating better content, getting better reviews, earning better links \u2014 they should be rewarded. And vice versa.<\/p>\n<p>But while a dip in traffic can be weathered, a sudden and total loss of visibility (for which there is no obvious cause) cannot.<\/p>\n<p>Google has the power to close a business down with the flick of a switch. And while the percentage of \u201cgood\u201d sites that get incorrectly lumped in with the \u201cbad\u201d may be small, that\u2019s no consolation if one of those false positives happens to be your business.<\/p>\n<p>Danny Sullivan, Google\u2019s public search liaison, is a great guy. He deals with a lot of heat from webmasters with good grace, patience and humour. But I took issue with this tweet.<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/twitter.com\/dannysullivan\/status\/1336442468355600384<\/p>\n<p>Because for a business doing things the right way search traffic is certainly not free.<\/p>\n<p>While that final click may be, it\u2019s the result of previous investment \u2014 be that in money, or time \u2014 in creating the kind of quality content that Google wishes to surface in its search results.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s the result of hard work building relationships, getting mentioned on other sites in your niche or in the media, providing great customer service, creating a great product.<\/p>\n<p>Or it\u2019s the result of buying an aged expired domain with strong (but unrelated) links, and throwing up some cheap content from Fiverr.<\/p>\n<p>The incentive and motivation to invest in high quality content decreases when there\u2019s a risk (even if that risk is small) that you could lose it all overnight. And the temptation to gamble with spam tactics (with considerably lower capital investment risk) becomes more compelling \u2014 particularly when those tactics can be seen to be working for competitors.<\/p>\n<p>25 billion spam pages a day becomes 50 billion, 100 billion, a <a href=\"https:\/\/skillcrush.com\/blog\/horribly-google-called-google\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">googol<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s not a good place for the web to be.<\/p>\n<h2 id='content-in-conclusion-and-our-advice-if-you-ve-been-hit-by-a-core-update'>In conclusion (and our advice if you\u2019ve been hit by a Core update)<\/h2>\n<p>Google\u2019s Core updates are designed to improve search quality.<\/p>\n<p>They may be generally succeeding (although that\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/devops\/comments\/c3g0cs\/is_it_just_me_or_is_google_getting_worse_at\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">open<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/sysadmin\/comments\/ew3i2y\/google_search_getting_worse_or\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">to<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/NoStupidQuestions\/comments\/kcfh35\/has_anyone_else_noticed_the_huge_decrease_in\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">debate<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>But there are still some HUGE loopholes that spammers are taking advantage of to rank. And the latest Core update doesn\u2019t seem to have improved Google\u2019s ability to detect and filter out these particular tactics.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Repurposed domains are still riding high<\/li>\n<li>Cloaked redirects still litter the SERPs (and can be dangerous for users)<\/li>\n<li>Doorway pages (or parasite pages) rank for numerous YMYL queries<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>On top of that (at least in my opinion) Google\u2019s Core updates can be too punitive on \u201cwhite hat\u201d sites which have not violated Google\u2019s guidelines. Fluctuations for these sites should be expected, but not complete loss of visibility.<\/p>\n<p>With this being said, I remain optimistic that Google genuinely wishes to improve its search results, and has no desire to penalize sites who are playing by the rules, creating great content, and providing a good experience for their users.<\/p>\n<p>I believe we\u2019re looking at collateral damage from Google\u2019s fight against spam. False positives perhaps, which would account for the ups and downs between Core updates when nothing changes in the interim.<\/p>\n<p>But false positives or otherwise, these big drops for \u201cwhite hat\u201d sites are devastating. And even if it\u2019s only happening to a small (but understandably vocal) minority, they deserve to be listened to.<\/p>\n<p>To put the scale into context, if one in a million web pages (0.0001%) are incorrectly flagged as low quality in a Core update, that\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/12\/14\/technology\/how-google-dominates.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">still six hundred thousand web pages<\/a>. That\u2019s a lot of collateral damage<\/p>\n<p>Finally, if you\u2019ve been hit by the recent Google Core update, our advice for now is to follow Google\u2019s advice:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Take an objective look at your content, and consider how it could be improved. Are you completely satisfying the search intent for your target keywords?<\/li>\n<li>Conduct <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/seo-audit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a full SEO audit<\/a> and ensure there are no technical issues holding your site back<\/li>\n<li>Work on your on-site <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/eat\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">E-A-T signals<\/a> (be clear about who you are, your expertise, why users should trust you)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/page-speed-optimization\/\" target=\"_blank\">Work on your site speed<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/core-web-vitals\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">make sure your Core Web Vitals are up to scratch<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Work on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/high-quality-backlinks\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">earning high quality backlinks<\/a> to boost your site\u2019s authority<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you have any questions, feel free to drop us a comment below.<\/p>\n<p>And hop on our mailing list for a slate of in-depth SEO tutorials and case studies coming your way in 2021.<\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Person\",\n    \"name\": \"David McSweeney\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/uk.linkedin.com\/in\/david-mcsweeney-79840154\"\n  }\n  }\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>David McSweeney is our Chief Editor here at Seobility. He wrote and edited most of the recent guides and articles on our blog. The following article is his assessment of the state of Google Core Updates. Google dropped an early Christmas present on the SEO community earlier this month, with their first (official) Core algorithm [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":3562,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-seo"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Our post Core update analysis reveals three spam tactics that continue to go unpunished, and questions whether Google is succeeding in their mission to improve search quality.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Our post Core update analysis reveals three spam tactics that continue to go unpunished, and questions whether Google is succeeding in their mission to improve search quality.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Seobility\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/seobility.net\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-18T13:44:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-15T15:18:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David McSweeney\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/twitter.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@seobility_net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@seobility_net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David McSweeney\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"David McSweeney\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/a65c7088ca82f92a48616f34cec32e25\"},\"headline\":\"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem [Opinion]\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-18T13:44:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-15T15:18:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\"},\"wordCount\":3838,\"commentCount\":39,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"General SEO\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\",\"name\":\"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-18T13:44:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-15T15:18:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/a65c7088ca82f92a48616f34cec32e25\"},\"description\":\"Our post Core update analysis reveals three spam tactics that continue to go unpunished, and questions whether Google is succeeding in their mission to improve search quality.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630,\"caption\":\"December-2020-Core-Update-opinion\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem [Opinion]\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3536\/\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Seobility\",\"description\":\"Online SEO Software &amp; Tools For Better Rankings\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/a65c7088ca82f92a48616f34cec32e25\",\"name\":\"David McSweeney\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/davidmc.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/davidmc.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/davidmc.jpg\",\"caption\":\"David McSweeney\"},\"description\":\"David combines 20+ years of experience in SEO with the passion for teaching people how to optimize their websites the right way. Unsurprisingly he loves SEO and writing. That's why David focuses on the particularly advanced SEO topics on the Seobility blog.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/author\/david-mcsweeney\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem","description":"Our post Core update analysis reveals three spam tactics that continue to go unpunished, and questions whether Google is succeeding in their mission to improve search quality.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem","og_description":"Our post Core update analysis reveals three spam tactics that continue to go unpunished, and questions whether Google is succeeding in their mission to improve search quality.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/","og_site_name":"Seobility","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/seobility.net\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-18T13:44:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-15T15:18:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"David McSweeney","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/twitter.png","twitter_creator":"@seobility_net","twitter_site":"@seobility_net","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David McSweeney","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/"},"author":{"name":"David McSweeney","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/a65c7088ca82f92a48616f34cec32e25"},"headline":"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem [Opinion]","datePublished":"2020-12-18T13:44:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-15T15:18:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/"},"wordCount":3838,"commentCount":39,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png","articleSection":["General SEO"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/","url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/","name":"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png","datePublished":"2020-12-18T13:44:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-15T15:18:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/a65c7088ca82f92a48616f34cec32e25"},"description":"Our post Core update analysis reveals three spam tactics that continue to go unpunished, and questions whether Google is succeeding in their mission to improve search quality.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/December-2020-Core-Update-opinion.png","width":1200,"height":630,"caption":"December-2020-Core-Update-opinion"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/december-core-update-analysis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"December Core Update Analysis: Sorry Google, You Have a Spam Problem [Opinion]","item":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3536\/"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/","name":"Seobility","description":"Online SEO Software &amp; Tools For Better Rankings","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/a65c7088ca82f92a48616f34cec32e25","name":"David McSweeney","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/davidmc.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/davidmc.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/davidmc.jpg","caption":"David McSweeney"},"description":"David combines 20+ years of experience in SEO with the passion for teaching people how to optimize their websites the right way. Unsurprisingly he loves SEO and writing. That's why David focuses on the particularly advanced SEO topics on the Seobility blog.","url":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/blog\/author\/david-mcsweeney\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3536\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.seobility.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}